Student-Athlete. Writer. Sportsaholic.

Category: Uncategorized

Opinion Essay

The Magic of March: How Madness Gets It Right

While other college sports are scrambling to ‘fix’ their postseason formats, college basketball already has the perfect formula for the sport. Unlike other postseason systems, where only a handful of teams have a realistic shot at glory, March Madness embraces the chaos. 

Take college football, for instance. Its new expansion to 12 teams, to somewhat mimic March Madness, might sound more inclusive, but let’s be honest, these teams are still the top programs that dominate year after year. Where’s the excitement in that? March Madness gives every team, no matter how small, a shot at glory. 

Every March, over 300 Division I basketball teams battle all season long for one of 68 desired spots in the tournament. What follows is a madness of basketball like no other. It is a celebration of chaos, underdog stories, and unrestricted passion that consumes the country for weeks. It’s not just a tournament—it’s a cultural phenomenon.

Teams from powerhouse programs to tiny schools with barely recognizable names, all get their chance to make some kind of history. It’s a playing field where a Cinderella story can dethrone a dynasty, and fans are guaranteed edge-of-their-seat drama every single round. 

In the opening weekend alone, 48 games are played over just four action-packed days. As if that weren’t enough, the women’s tournament kicks off the following week, keeping the excitement alive even longer. No other event in North American sports offers this level of intensity, with so many teams, games, and unpredictable moments crammed into such a short span. There’s no downtime, no dragging gaps between rounds—just relentless, nonstop action. It’s the ultimate feast for sports fans, pure overload in the best way imaginable.

March Madness has also given us legendary moments that live on forever. Michael Jordan’s shot to win the 1982 championship, UMBC shocking the world as a 16-seed by defeating a 1-seed powerhouse like UVA, and countless others. It’s also a unifying force, bringing together fans from all walks of life in celebration of the game.

As much as I would love to think professional sports like the WNBA and NBA playoffs get the same and equal amount of attention and coverage, March Madness is truly one of the only sporting events where we see that the magic isn’t just limited to the men’s tournament. Who can forget Caitlin Clark’s record-breaking performances last year or UCONN’s dominance for the last decade? The women’s side of March Madness brings the same drama, passion, and unforgettable moments, proving that basketball greatness knows no gender. 

For both the men’s and women’s tournaments offices turn into battlegrounds of bracket debates, fans rearrange their schedules to catch the action, and even casual viewers tune in for the chaos. March Madness isn’t just a basketball tournament, it’s a national obsession. Whether you’re a die-hard fan or someone who can’t name a single player, it’s impossible to ignore the energy that takes over the country. 

In a world where sports leagues are constantly fiddling with their formats to boost ratings or attract new fans, March Madness stands apart. It’s chaotic, unpredictable, and absolutely perfect the way it is. Whether you’re in it for the upsets, the Cinderella stories, or just the sheer joy of basketball, March Madness delivers something no other postseason can: magic with a dash of madness.

Research Essay

“Beyond the Sidelines: The Evolving Identity of WAGs in Modern Sports Culture”

Since the beginning of professional male sports, there have been girlfriends and wives of said professional male athletes. The stereotypical idea of a “nobody” woman dating or marrying a professional athlete, using their money and fame for their own benefit. That’s nothing new. However, these WAGs (Wives & Girlfriends of professional athletes) have evolved from mere companions on the sideline to capturing the media’s attention as public figures who are more than just money-spenders. But this rise from the shadows isn’t just a matter of fame. It’s seemingly a reflection of society’s shifting views on gender, celebrity, and power. By exploring the evolution of WAGs through the lens of media representation, cultural and gendered expectations, and individuality, we can see how these women have transformed from mere “plus-ones” in the sports world to influential public figures shaping culture and brand. The question is though, are all WAGS the same? 

The Stereotypical WAGS

The stereotypical WAG often embodies a glamorous, high-profile lifestyle centered around luxury, fashion, and the privileges that come with being married to or dating a professional athlete. Kylie Kelce, wife of NFL player Jason Kelce, and Coleen Rooney, wife of English soccer star Wayne Rooney, are prime examples of this archetype. Both women have become synonymous with a life of high-end shopping, exclusive events, and constant media attention focused on their appearances and social lives. Kylie Kelce is not huge on posting “the lavish lifestyle” but still frequently shares her life and her family in relation to her husband. While she has an established social media following, much of her public image is built around her role as the partner of a star athlete, which has drawn both admiration and criticism. 

Similarly, Coleen Rooney’s fame grew exponentially in the wake of her marriage to Wayne Rooney, especially during the 2006 FIFA World Cup, when she was thrust into the spotlight along with other WAGs. The British media regularly scrutinized her shopping habits, fashion choices, and social activities, framing her as the quintessential WAG who symbolized wealth, glamour, and excess. Coleen might seem different due to her achievements, including her work as a writer and TV personality, however, her public identity is still linked with her husband’s fame. The stereotypical WAG image often paints these women as accessories to their partners, with their value being tied to their ability to represent luxury and the good life. This portrayal of WAGs as superficial and materialistic continues to perpetuate a narrow and one-dimensional view of women in the sports world, ignoring their individuality.

The WAGfluncer 

Influencer WAGs like Alix Earle and Morgan Riddle bring a modern approach to the WAG label, leveraging social media to build independent brands while also drawing criticism for sometimes reinforcing superficial stereotypes. Alix Earle is known for her past relationship with MLB player Tyler Wade and now relationship with NFL player Braxton Berrios. Earle captivated millions on TikTok with lifestyle content that blends beauty, fashion, and glimpses of her high-profile relationships. Similarly, Morgan Riddle, who is dating tennis star Taylor Fritz, has gained a large following by offering fans a glamorous, behind-the-scenes look at professional tennis life. By frequently highlighting high-end fashion, exotic vacations, and backstage access, these influencer WAGs risk reinforcing stereotypes of WAGs as status-seeking socialites who use their relationships with athletes as stepping stones to personal fame and financial gain. This portrayal can make it challenging for the public to see beyond the influencer facade, ultimately limiting how these women are perceived outside of their partner’s celebrity sphere.

The Entrepreneur WAG

The Entrepreneur WAG represents a new kind of sports partner who turns their public platform into successful, independent business ventures, reshaping the traditional role of the athlete’s spouse. Kristin Juszczyk, wife of NFL player Kyle Juszczyk, embodies this through her work in wellness, fitness, and fashion. She has cultivated a unique brand that leverages her knowledge and passion for health, creating a career path distinctly her own. And creating insane sports fashion for other WAGS and brands, making a name for herself. Similarly, other Entrepreneur WAGs, like Ayesha Curry, wife of NBA star Stephen Curry, have turned their public presence into thriving business ventures. Ayesha has built a successful culinary empire through cookbooks, a restaurant chain, and a lifestyle brand. These women showcase how WAGs can leverage their influence to establish financial independence, create brands that reflect their personal passions, and achieve visibility beyond their relationships. By building businesses that emphasize wellness, fashion, and food, Entrepreneur WAGs challenge the stereotype of WAGs as merely spending or enjoying their partner’s wealth. Instead, they show that they are powerful figures contributing meaningfully to their industries and communities.

WAG? More like HAB or PAS.

The Sports WAG represents a unique evolution of the WAG, where the athlete’s partner is not just a supportive figure but an accomplished or more well-known professional athlete in their own right. These women challenge the traditional narrative by excelling in their own sports careers, often achieving fame and recognition independent of their relationships. Simone Biles, for instance, is an Olympic gold medalist and one of the most decorated gymnasts in history. While she is in a relationship with NFL player Jonathan Owens, Biles’ own athletic achievements and her advocacy for mental health have solidified her as an icon in her own right. In reality, Jonathan Owens is more of a HAB (husband and boyfriend of professional athletes) than Simone Biles is a WAG, and the media has made it known. Her relationship with Owens, although public, does not define her, and her success as an athlete and role model stands far apart from the typical WAG persona.

Similarly, Sue Bird, a legend in women’s basketball, is one of the most decorated players in WNBA history. In addition to her sports accomplishments, Bird has been in a long-term relationship with soccer star Megan Rapinoe, a celebrated figure in women’s soccer known for her activism and leadership on and off the field. Both women have used their platforms to advocate for gender equality, social justice, and LGBTQ+ rights, establishing themselves as influential public figures beyond their athletic careers. Rapinoe, like Bird, has been celebrated for her accomplishments and activism, making her far more than just the “partner” of another well-known athlete. These Sports WAGs defy traditional expectations by building careers and public identities that reflect their own talents and values, a part from who their significant other is.

High Profile WAG

The Celebrity WAG is a type that transcends the traditional role of a supportive partner, carving out a public persona that is as influential as, or even more notable than, their partner’s fame. Taylor Swift, for example, has maintained a wildly successful career as a global pop star, and her relationship with NFL player Travis Kelce only adds to her ever-growing media presence. While their relationship has drawn attention, Swift’s personal brand, rooted in her music and activism, remains the focal point of her public image, showing how a Celebrity WAG can maintain independence despite being in a high-profile relationship. Similarly, Victoria Beckham, whose marriage to soccer legend David Beckham made her a global icon, leveraged her fame from her Spice Girls days to build a successful fashion empire. Victoria’s influence extends far beyond being “Posh Spice” or a “football wife.” She is a businesswoman and fashion mogul, using her platform to promote her personal brand while maintaining a distinct identity from her husband’s sporting achievements. 

Historically, figures like Marilyn Monroe also fit this archetype, though in a more complex light. Monroe’s brief marriage to baseball legend Joe DiMaggio placed her in the category of the Celebrity WAG, but her fame far eclipsed her role as DiMaggio’s wife. Monroe’s image as a Hollywood icon was built on her own acting career, and while her relationship with DiMaggio was highly publicized, it was Monroe’s personal achievements and persona that captivated the world. Vanessa Hudgens, in her relationship with MLB player Cole Tucker, represents another modern example of the Celebrity WAG, where her acting career continues to be her main identity, while her relationship garners media attention without defining her. These women embody a shift in the WAG archetype, showing that when the individual celebrity is strong enough, the relationship becomes just one part of a multifaceted identity that encompasses personal career success, public image, and influence. 

In conclusion, the evolving portrayal of WAGs highlights the broader shifts in society’s views on gender, fame, and personal identity. While the stereotypical WAGs of the past were often defined by their association with their partners’ athletic careers, today’s WAGs come in many forms, each contributing to sports culture in unique ways. The modern WAG is no longer confined to a single, one-dimensional role from the influencer WAGs to the Entrepreneur WAGs. Meanwhile, Celebrity and athlete WAGs have redefined what it means to be in a relationship with an athlete, showcasing their own athletic prowess, public presence, and activism while challenging traditional gender expectations. Unfortunately, all of these women continue to be connected under this one term. 

However, these women are more than just the label they are given in many ways. As the WAG identity continues to evolve, it becomes clear that these women are no longer merely accessories to their partners’ fame, but independent, influential figures in their own right, shaping culture both within and outside of the sports world. In doing so, they have redefined what it means to be a WAG, turning the name into one of empowerment and independence. 

An Emotion in the Public Sphere

Continued Frustration in Women’s Sports Coverage 

The emotion of frustration isn’t out of the ordinary for sports fans. Whether you yell at the television after a bad play, roll your eyes at annoying headlines, or your fantasy team makes steam come out of your ears, these frustrations are not new. Unfortunately for women’s sports and women’s media, these frustrations go beyond missed layups or bad headlines. 

Even in the current times, with the rise in women’s sports, the lack of equal and quality media coverage is nowhere near being up to par. This frustration isn’t solely just about less coverage but about the difference in coverage. We consistently see men’s sports content focusing on detailed analysis, performance, and legacy. While women’s sports are often treated like an afterthought, as if they don’t deserve the same in-depth look. This sends a frustrating message to fans that women’s sports aren’t as important in the industry, even though the growing fan base and packed stadiums say otherwise. 

Do you need examples? Take Ben Bolch’s LA Time Article that labels the LSU women’s basketball team as “dirty debutantes.” Or columnist Gregg Doyel of the Indianapolis Star saying to Caitlin Clark, “Start doing it to me and we’ll get along just fine” after Clark explained her signature heart-shaped hand gesture. Also, let’s talk about the LACK of media coverage of the abusive male coaches in the National Women’s Soccer League that almost took these female athletes out of the game forever. Would this kind of media coverage or lack of coverage EVER occur while covering male athletes? Dwell on that. 

Sources:

https://www.latimes.com/sports/ucla/story/2024-03-29/ucla-lsu-america-sweethearts-versus-basketball-villains

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/womens-sports-sexualizing-athletes-1.7180765

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2022/feb/05/slow-progress-continues-for-women-in-us-sports-media

Opinion Essay


I Could Care Less About What Athlete I Would Sit Next to on a 9-hour Flight 

I was the one outside throwing a football in my front yard with my dad. I was the one dragging my dad into DC to see all the live sports I could. I was the one with too many sports trophies, that I needed a second self in my room. I was the one being told that I was “the son my dad never had.” 

When, in actuality, my dad has a son. I have a brother. He just wasn’t that into sports—I was. And still am. 

So, why am I the “son?” Why can’t I just be my dad’s daughter, who happens to like sports? Why can’t I look at my social media feed and see athletes who look like me? Why do men’s sports get all the attention? Why is there an ESPN and an ESPNW? Why is mainstream media still pushing the same gender stereotypes that told everyone that I was “the son my dad never had?” 

As someone who consumes more sports media on a daily basis than might be healthy, I think about these questions daily. And in all honesty, it grinds my gears. Truly boils my blood. Platforms like ESPN, Bleacher Report, and Sports Center, with their seemingly neutral titles, you would think they would have damn near equal coverage of all aspects of the sports industry, but because there is no “W” or “girls” attached to it, I’m shit out of luck on that equal coverage. 

If you scroll through ESPN’s Instagram, what do you see? A bunch of posts updating its millions of followers on sports. Let’s be more transparent: you only see one side of the sports industry. In a growing time for women’s sports and women’s athletes, we are still seeing a lack of equal media representation on mainstream platforms. This lack of representation has caused a wave in the creation of new women-run and women-centered sports media platforms. This wave is great. It’s exciting. It’s empowering to see. However, some of these platforms have begun to take this new “girly” side of sports a bit too far. 

This new, so-called “girly” sports media may seem harmless or even empowering on the surface, but it ultimately does more destruction than good. When some of these new women’s sports media platforms create “softer” content with flowers and pinks or use more “feminine” structures throughout, it sends the message that women in sports should continue to conform to that narrow, gendered idea of what it means to be female. This is damaging not only for women athletes but also for how society views women’s sports in general. It perpetuates the idea that women should fit into prescribed gender roles, especially in a field that already has women behind the curve. 

Why are these platforms more concerned with these “girly” and “fluffy” content instead of highlighting key games, analyzing performance, or discussing real-world issues, like every other male-dominant platform? I could care less about “Which NFL QB matches my zodiac sign?” or “Which MLB star would I sit next to on a 9-hour flight?” Oh, and you can see the infuriating difference in each platform due to its appearance. NEWS FLASH: Not every girl likes pink, flowers, and rainbows. Not every girl wants to label the Bills going 3-0 as “so slay” or “very demure.” Why are we perpetuating the idea that all women should fit into prescribed gender roles, even in an industry that already has women behind the curve? 

While there is room for lighthearted content in sports and my intention is not to diminish these accounts, like Sports Girls Club, that make some engaging and fun posts. I aim to bring to light that this overwhelming focus on the “girly” content belittles the real stories that matter: the grind, the talent, and the relentless determination that define athletes. It’s a subtle but dangerous shift. By relegating women’s sports to this “girly” centered content, the media sends a clear message: that women’s sports aren’t to be taken as seriously as men’s. 

This type of content not only underrepresents women’s athletic achievements but also fuels the idea of what women’s sports are. Content covered in pink bows, focusing on what is trendy to wear to a game, or looking at cute quarterbacks is not the women’s sports content that deserves to fill the mainstream media. It cheapens the narrative, drowning out real issues like pay equity or discrimination while missing insane game highlights or groundbreaking victories. In a space where women athletes already fight for equal airtime and respect, this kind of shallow media coverage reinforces the false notion that these women athletes’ value lies more in their personalities or appearance than their talent. 

Ambassadorship Topic


Sports have always played a significant role in my life. Sports shapes culture, unites people, and inspires entire communities. However, as a young woman growing up in this new age of media, one thing that has caught my attention is the vast difference in how men’s and women’s sports are portrayed in the media. I find this disparity both intriguing and concerning because, despite the progress in women’s sports over the years, there still seems to be a considerable gap in how media coverage treats athletes based on gender. This topic is interesting to me, not only as a massive sports fan but also as someone invested in understanding how media shapes perceptions and narratives. From a young age, I noticed that most of the games on mainstream television were men’s sports. Male athletes and teams would dominate headlines, airtime, and social media discussions. Events like the Super Bowl, NBA Finals, and World Cup for men’s teams seemed to have more attention worldwide, while equally talented female athletes often struggled to receive even a fraction of the same coverage. This has led me to question why there is such an imbalance, despite increasing success and participation in women’s sports. I want to dive deeper into where this occurs across this media. Using platforms like ESPN, Bleacher Report, Sports Illustrated, ESPNW, TOGETHXR, Sports Girls Club, etc. To understand the causes of this disparity. Is it purely a reflection of audience demand, or are there deeper institutional biases at play?

© 2026 Hannah Boone

Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑